Peer-review Forum: Please upload your draft of your Comparative Summaries for peer- to- peer review and commentary

. Follow the directions and guidelines in the Assignment 1 section of this module. Students should comment on at least 5 other students’

summaries. Some elements to look for:

1. Do the summaries explain the main ideas in the student’s own words?

2. Does the student use a signal phrase to introduce the author and the title of the article?

3. Does the student offer a paragraph or section where he or she evaluates the source for bias, relevance, or importance in the conversation? 4. Does the student evaluate the ways in which the articles might treat the same topic differently or through a unique lens?

5. Does the student reflect on how the assignment may have changed his or her own thinking?

By midnight Day 3, post 1 original document/draft/summary as a post. By midnight Day 7, post at least 5 responses to your peers’

draft/summary. Each response should be roughly 200 words. Respond to the prompts posted in that week’s Peer Review Forum as each applies

to the writing task for that week. A Writer’s Reference, 9th ed. (2018): “Write Helpful Peer Review Comments ”: p.21. Use this page as a model for constructive comments. Be sure to use quotation marks wherever you quote from other’s drafts directly.

 

SOLUTIONS 

 

1. Do the summaries explain the main ideas in the student’s own words? To evaluate this question, one would need to look at the summaries themselves. In general, a good summary should explain the main ideas of the original text in the student's own words. This means that the student should avoid copying large chunks of text directly from the source and instead focus on restating the information in their own words.

2. Does the student use a signal phrase to introduce the author and the title of the article? A signal phrase is a phrase that introduces the author and/or the title of the article. Examples of signal phrases include "According to," "In the article," "As stated by," etc. Using a signal phrase is important because it helps the reader to understand where the information is coming from and gives credit to the original author.

3. Does the student offer a paragraph or section where he or she evaluates the source for bias, relevance, or importance in the conversation? In a critical evaluation of a source, it is important to consider factors such as bias, relevance, and importance. A good summary should include a section where the student evaluates the source on these factors. This could involve discussing the author's background and potential biases, considering how the information in the article is relevant to the larger conversation or field of study, and explaining why the source is important for understanding the topic at hand.

4. Does the student evaluate the ways in which the articles might treat the same topic differently or through a unique lens? If the assignment involves summarizing multiple sources on the same topic, it is important to evaluate how each article approaches the topic differently. This could involve comparing and contrasting the arguments made in each source, looking for similarities and differences in the evidence presented, or considering how each author's perspective or background might shape their interpretation of the topic.

5. Does the student reflect on how the assignment may have changed his or her own thinking? A good summary should not only summarize the main ideas of the article but also reflect on how the information presented in the article has affected the student's own thinking. This could involve discussing how the article has challenged or reinforced the student's existing beliefs or knowledge on the topic, or explaining how the information presented in the article might be relevant to the student's own life or future work.