10 reasons how biomedical sciences apply to the clinical case updated 2023
A PowerPoint presentation of a critical appraisal I did, which I will attach. My presentation needs to be 30 minutes long. CATEGORY COMMENTS* Points Preparation and Quality of Presentation Presentation of the significant details of the clinical case Spoke clearly and
emphasized important points. Adequate pace of delivery within required presentation length (~30 min) Professionalism of presentation slides
(i.e. no typos, grammatically correct, consistency and clarity formatting) Answered and handled all questions appropriately in a confident manner. 0-10 points PICO Question Background search was conducted thoroughly and prior learning was reviewed and applied in developing the
PICO question. All PICO components are clearly defined, correctly written, and in the correct order. The PICO question is appropriately derived from the case and reflects a clinically relevant question. 0-10 points Background on Topic/Biomedical Able to
thoroughly explain the events that occur at the physiological, and/or biochemical, cellular and molecular levels of the biomedical topic relevant to the case
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of how biomedical sciences/case topic apply to the clinical case
Demonstrates knowledge of pathology/disease implication on oral health and dental treatment ___0-15 points Search and References Description of the Key steps in the
search strategy were completed; 1) key words and or MeSH terms were relevant to the PICO 2) PubMed or other EB search engines were used, 3) article retrieved from a peer-
reviewed journal 4) article is of appropriate level of evidence and relevant to the PICO 5) References listed and formatted appropriately. 0-5 points
Pathology: The Clinical Description of Human Disease
Pathology (from the Greek word pathology, meaning the study of suffering) refers to the specialty of medical science concerned with the cause, development, structural/functional changes, and natural history associated with diseases.
Disease refers to a definable deviation from a normal phenotype (observable characteristics due to genome and environment), evident via patient complaints (symptoms), and/or the measurements of a careful observer (signs). The cause of the disease is referred to as its etiology (from the Greek word meaning the study of cause). One disease entity can have more than one etiology, and one etiology can lead to more than one disease.
Each disease entity develops through a series of mechanistic chemical and cellular steps. This stepwise process of disease development is referred to as its pathogenesis (from the Greek word meaning generation of suffering). Pathogenesis can refer to the changes in the structure or function of an organism at the gross/clinical level, and it can refer to the stepwise molecular abnormalities leading to changes in cellular and tissue function.
The presentation of a disease to a clinician is in the form of a human patient with variably specific complaints (symptoms), to which the examining physicians can add diagnostic sensitivity and specificity by making observations (screening for signs of diseases). These phenotypic (measurable characteristic) abnormalities reflect the interaction of the genotype (cytogenetic and nucleic acid sequence/expression) of the patient and his/her environment. Patient workup uses present illness history with reference to past medical
history, review of other organ systems for other abnormalities, review of family history, physical examination, radiographic studies, clinical laboratory studies (for example, peripheral blood or CSF specimens), and anatomic pathology laboratory studies (for example, tissue biopsy or pleural fluid cytology specimens). As you will see from other chapters in this book, the ability to rapidly and inexpensively screen for chromosomal translocations, copy number variation, genetic variation, and abundance of mRNA and miRNA is adding substantial molecular correlative information to the workup of diseases.
The differential diagnosis represents the set of possible diagnoses that could account for symptoms and signs associated with the condition of the patient.
The conclusion of the workup generally results in a specific diagnosis which meets a set of diagnostic criteria, and which explains the patient’s symptoms and phenotypic abnormalities. Obviously, arrival at the correct diagnosis is a function of the examining physician and pathologist (fund of knowledge, experience, alertness), the prevalence of the disease in question in the particular patient (age, race, sex, site), and the sensitivity/specificity of the screening tests used (physical exam, vital signs, blood solutes, tissue stains, genetic assays).
The pathologic diagnosis represents the best estimate currently possible of the disease entity affecting the patient, and is the basis for downstream follow-up and treatment decisions. The diagnosis implies a natural history (course of disease, including chronicity, functional impairment, survival) that most patients with this disease are expected to follow. Be aware that not all patients with a given disease will naturally follow the same disease course, so differences in patient outcome do not necessarily correspond to incorrect diagnosis.
Variables that independently correlate with clinical outcome differences are called independent prognostic variables, and are routinely assessed in an effort to predict the natural history of the disease in the patient. It is also important to note that medical therapies for specific diseases do not always work. Variables that independently correlate with (predict) responses to therapy are called independent predictive variables.
Order an assignment through this link:https://orders.assignmentcafe.com/
References