What are the limitations of each paradigm? In other words, what do they ignore or discount, and how does the other paradigm potentially fill this

gap? Finally, apply the chosen paradigms to any historical or contemporary event within international politics to compare and contrast how each

paradigm views that particular phenomenon and how they would go about resolving it. For instance, you could choose World War II, the Vietnam

War, the proliferation of nuclear weapons, genocide, the South China Sea, North Korea, international migration, climate change, financial crises,

etc. This may require you to do some background reading – please cite your sources if you do. Some paradigms will be better for explanatory purposes than others depending on the topic or event